4.13.2017

A Poet in Cuba

Author’s Note

A Poet in Cuba: This is the third installment of “A Poet In…” series, the first, “A Poet in China,” dates from 2011, and the second, “A Poet in India,” was written in 2015.  Both can be found by googling the title in question along with my name. In each of these instances, I kept a diary of my travel to the country in question. The result is what might be called an “outer/inner” portrait of my travel experiences, the first part dealing with encounters with people and places, the second dealing with visits to various venues inside my mind.  Being a poet, (five books and numerous publications), I am confident that those who know me will not be surprised to discover that some of the rooms of my imagination became, during the course of travel, furnished with poems.

My lovely wife, Nirmala, accompanied me on all three journeys—no surprise and certainly no complaints here, since we have been inseparable for nearly half a century.  Before traveling to Cuba, we spent a few days in Miami Beach, where this little outer/inner travelogue begins.

A Poet in Cuba

Miami Beach, March 24, 2017


Nirmala and I are spending a few days at the South Beach section of Miami Beach.  South Beach is of interest due to the many Art Deco buildings along Ocean Highway and Collins Avenue.  This was a fashionable area in the twenties and thirties, when hotels were still built on a human scale, and not on the impersonal, monumental and more profitable scale that would soon follow. When the in-crowd moved to outsized hotels along the beaches to the north, developers, being developers, planned to tear down most of the historic Art Deco Buildings and replace them with huge, multi-storied Godzillas.  A prescient artist named Leonard Horowitz founded a conservation society, oversaw and participated in the restoration of many of the Art Deco structures, mostly hotels, which were built from 1926-1946.  Eight hundred structures were among the first to be registered with the National Register of Historic Places.  This was at a time before corporations were considered to be persons; in this rare case, the fat guys didn’t win.




Hordes of people under thirty everywhere!  South Beach is a popular destination for spring break.  The young ones drink to excess, just like a subgroup of people of my age, namely those who live in tents under overpasses in cities like Baltimore.  It reminds me of the drinking habits which I witnessed at a bar in Prague.  I watched in amazement as the man next to me, a middle-aged worker, downed stein after stein of beer, after which he somehow managed not to fall off his stool.  Cool?  No.

The beach is good; it is quite wide.  I wore my bathing trunks under my pants.  Would you believe I hesitated to remove my pants on the beach?

It is 1954,  I was nine years old.  We parked our brand-new ’54 Ford, at a parking area near the boardwalk of Asbury Park, New Jersey.  Just like in Miami, I removed my pants in the car, which exposed my swimming trunks underneath. A really nasty cop came and started yelling at my father, who was the driver.  It seems that I had just done something terribly obscene, and was corrupting the morals of the town. He threatened to arrest my father, but Dad acted sufficiently contrite.  The little man obviously enjoyed shaming people; our morning low had provided him with a morning high.  The incident remains seared in my memory.

In some part of my brain, the nasty copy of 1954, long since dead, no doubt, was still hidden somewhere in my brain, ready to strike like a snake.  Insight removed his imaginary fangs, and, with a wistful smile, I moved on.

As you might have guessed, nobody noticed.  An old man dropping his pants to reveal a bathing suit underneath is about as interesting as watching a stray dog pee.

The water was too cold for swimming; we soon returned to our hotel.

On the bathroom wall of our hotel room, the following stenciled quote greeted me:

No sé cuál es mi camino, todavia estoy caminando sobre él.
                                                              --Olivia Newton-John

Well, duh.  Here’s how I modified the quote:

Sé exactamente cuál es mi camino, todavia estoy caminando sobre él, en dépit de toute.
                                                               --Thomas Dorsett

Miami Beach, March 25, 2017

In the morning, we obtained information regarding an outdoor music event on the evening of March 25, a few blocks from our hotel.  At the Frank Gehry-designed New World Center, a concert was to be broadcast onto a huge white wall of that building, while listeners sat on the lawn before it.  We got there early—then it began to pour.  What to do?  Go back to the hotel?  Buy tickets?  We eagerly chose the latter option.

The concert hall is one of those modern facilities where the seats surround the stage.  We were seated to the side of the strings. The acoustics were quite good.




The New World Orchestra consists of young musicians, nearly all of whom are under thirty.  Each of them has received  a scholarship in order to participate in the orchestra, which was founded and is still directed by the renowned Michael Tilson Thomas.  The purpose is, as one would imagine, to train talented young people for careers in music.

The program consisted of Beethoven’s Second Symphony and Shostakovitch’s Twelfth, conducted by James Conlin from the L.A. Philharmonic.  The tempi in the Beethoven work were brisk; the tensions, so characteristic of the composer's music, were expressed well by the strings. The quirkiness of the last movement, which so scandalized critics in Beethoven's day, came across well.  The lyrical elements, especially from the woodwinds, did not, however,  meet the highest professional standards.  With experience and age, improvements will follow.

Shostakovitch’s Twelfth, which I had not heard before, was great.  It hardly seemed like an uplifting example of Socialist Realism, which it nominally is, or the Soviets wouldn’t have allowed it to be performed.  Like much of the composer’s music, it is dark and ironic, an inner reaction to the surrounding inanities and oppression of the Soviet regime.  One of the French horn soloists was outstanding.

March 26, 2017, South Beach

Nirmala informed me that South Beach is a popular destination for gays.  I didn’t notice many, but that doesn’t mean much.  This morning, on the way back from a coffee break at a local Starbuck’s, I did, however,  notice several hookers.

One was trying to solicit a young man, who was leaning nonchalantly against a parked car.  “I’ll do anything you want for a free bottle of liquor,” she exclaimed, poor thing, but the young man refused.  As I passed by, she said to me, “Can I help you with your bags, Sir?” 

The difference between the solicitation of a young man and that of an old one was drily noted.


We soon transferred to a hotel near the Miami Airport, where we met members of our travel group, filled out forms, etc. in preparation for a flight to Havana the next day.  We traveled with Go Ahead Tours; it is now time to introduce you to our tour guide, the best one we ever had.

Lyn Quigg made sure that we all had a good time.  Her social and organizational skills are outstanding.  Not only did she keep us on schedule—and we had a very busy schedule indeed—she arranged many “surprise” events, such as a city tour of Havana in pre-revolutionary American cars from the 1950s. Americans, only recently allowed to visit Cuba, cannot simply come as tourists; they must be enrolled in an educational program.  (A bureaucratic detail regarding American visitors to Cuba demands that we keep a diary of our trip for at least five years.  I doubt if the Cuban government spotchecks U.S. tourists, in order to assure that this rule is kept, but, in my case at least, this travelogue would certainly be all the proof the government would need!) As Lyn told us, visitors from other countries get to see buildings, bridges, etc.; we saw those things as well, but were able to have many unforgettable interactions with the Cuban people, which were the best parts of the tour.  Without our exceptional tour guide, our trip would not have been as memorable as it was.  Thank you, Lyn!





March 27, 2017, Havana

After an uneventful flight, we arrived in Havana.  We had a busy schedule; we didn’t arrive at our hotel until about 4 P.M.  In Havana, we met our local tour guide, José Luis Moreno.
He was excellent as well.  He was very knowledgeable and answered all our questions.  We didn’t sense any governmental pressure on him to present official interpretations of life in Cuba.



Our first stop was the exceedingly ugly Revolutionary Square.  It is also one of the largest squares in the world, measuring over 72,000 square meters.  It is dominated by a memorial to José Martí, who helped liberate Cuba from Spanish rule in the 1890s.  The opposite side of the square is flanked by government buildings, one with a large steel outline of Che's face on its façade, another with a similar portrait of Cienfuegos, another hero of the revolution.  There is no portrait of Castro. Fidel didn’t want any statues or other monuments commemorating him; he wanted to live on through his words and deeds. (Castro, unlike his brother Raúl, was quite articulate.)  Quotes from Castro are, however, to be found here and there in public places.   They stand out, along with the famous quote of Che’s, Hasta la Victoria Siempre, (Towards Victory Always), since there are absolutely no advertisements in Cuba. No billboards proclaiming such things as, “Reach for the Stars! Smoke Monte Cristo Cigars!” or “Drink Che Cola, the Official Drink of the Revolution!” 



The Plaza de la Revolución is like the dried-out bed of a huge lake, with the difference that it is covered with concrete instead of caked mud.  Many of Fidel’s speeches and those of other dignitaries were, and still are, given here.  Those lacking zeal for communism must have been very bored indeed; at least that’s the way I imagine it.  The square has undoubtedly been filled by those who were required to attend. (The requirement of giving the appearance of enthusiasm, is, of course, not limited to Cuba.  When I was a bureaucrat at the Baltimore City Health Department, the entire staff was suddenly summoned to stop what they were doing, and line up along Pratt Street, in order to cheer Ronald Reagan as he whooshed by in a limousine. I felt like an idiot.)

After that, we took a tour of old Havana.  The picture below is of the historic San Francisco Square, located not far from where cargo ships used to unload their wares.  (I imagine slaves were sold there as well.) The church now functions as a concert hall, one of the best in Havana, we were told.




Regarding non-functional churches, there are plenty.  Not many Cubans are practicing Catholics.

A highlight of the day was a visit to a local artist, Lorenzo Lopez.  He presented a huge work of his, which dominated the main room of his impressive house.  The picture I took of it didn’t turn out well, so I will describe it instead.  It consisted of seven large circles, arranged in a steel frame; the circles formed a six-pointed star, with one circle in the middle.  The medallion at the bottom was a huge yellow smiley face.  Lorenzo informed us, in a rather manic way, that all we need to do is to smile and troubles would treacle off our tables like, well, treacle.  He certainly isn’t a great artist, but he obviously enjoyed what he was doing. A good place for his work and others like it would be the Baltimore Visionary Arts Museum, which presents quirky and sometimes quite beautiful works of untrained artists.

I asked the ebullient artist if he ever came down form his high.  Never, he told me, never, never, never.  If I had to live in a land where it was always day and the sun was a perpetual smiley face in a cloudless sky, I would very much miss the balance that night provides; I would have to create my own darkness; I would sometimes spend time in the shade.

His Pollyanna view of life got me thinking—What is the source of my happiness, albeit intermittent and measured, yet happiness nevertheless?  That night I began my first poem in Cuba; here is the final version:

I’m not tired, I’m not weary,
Soon I’ll be sleeping a lot.
In the meantime, I am happy—
What’s my secret?  Love and
Music, Wisdom’s key:
If you want to find it, lose it;
Meditate--then rock.

Notes
Some of you might know that the words "tired" and "weary" of the first line are a reference to the opening words of that wonderful gospel song by Thomas A. Dorsey, "Peace in the Valley."

My mentor in poetry, the renowned poet, José Garcia Villa, told 
me long ago that poets shouldn't write poems while traveling; they should give full attention to their travels instead.  I basically agree; I did not want to write any poems during the trip.  Yet when a line comes to me, as if out of nowhere, I have no choice but to try to give it a fitting home.



March 28, 2017, Havana




'

Another full day which began with a walking tour of old Havana conducted by a local architect.  Impressive.  After that we visited the National Museum of Fine Arts, which contains examples of Cuban art as selected, I imagine, by government officials.  Not impressive at all.

We had lunch at the Paladar Atelier.  A paladar is a private restaurant, a relatively new phenomenon.  The owners of paladars have to pay taxes to the state; otherwise, there isn't much taxation in Cuba.  There are, by the way, two currencies in Cuba; one, the peso, for Cuban citizens, and another, the peso convertible, which foreigners must use.  25 pesos equal one peso convertible.  Credit cards are of no use in Cuba; everything is paid in cash.

We ate at many paladars; they were spacious, clean, and comfortable places to eat.  The food was good, sometimes a little more than good, and always exceedingly bland.  I was surprised to discover that so few spices are used in contemporary Cuban cuisine.  Cuba could use a few non-Jesuit missionaries, preaching the yummy and secular gospel of spice. (Nirmala, I'm pleased to say, converted me spicefully many years ago.)

Cubans, we were told, don't eat out much.  Money is scarce; the salaries are low.  The tab at a paladar could easily amount to a month's salary.  Nirmala and I, both pescatarians, usually ordered, you guessed it, fish.


The Havana bar where Hemingway downed innumerable mojitos.

After this, we made a surprise visit to a dance studio. All the dancers obviously practice a lot; they also demonstrated their considerable acrobatic skills. The performance was superb. I asked one of the dancers how long he practiced daily--six hours, he replied.  When did he start?  At age six.  You can't perform strenuous dance like this for long--when do you retire from it?  Early 30s.  The skill, determination, and dedication of these dancers, who don't get paid much, was an inspiration. 



In the evening, we attended a "Review of the Buena Vista Social Club."  If you expected music with even a hint of the grandeur of the great artists who performed in the Wim Wenders film, you would be sorely disappointed.  The venue looks like a Bavarian beer hall filled with thirsty tourists. A Cuban with any musical sense wouldn't be caught dead here.  There were however, several half-dead Cubans present; these were the musicians.


March 29, 2017, Havana


The day began with a visit to a tobacco factory, which was very enjoyable. Although we were not permitted to take photographs inside this factory, we were allowed to take a photo through the window of another cigar factory, where the conditions were similar.

The factory we visited was a large pre-revolutionary building, similar to those that were present in every American city decades ago, some of which, long since abandoned and falling apart, have become, in the words of Trump, "rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation."




Just as astronomers see the past when they look into space, since the light from a galaxy can take millions, or even billions of years to reach us, a look into this cigar factory is like looking into the past as well: these are how American factories used to be in the first half of the past century. No automation! Lots of workers doing repetitive work.

We were permitted to ask the workers questions.  They work two four hour shifts beginning at 8:30 a.m., with an hour off for lunch at 12:30.  At 8 a.m., they gather to read. (One of Fidel's outstanding achievements was wiping out illiteracy, which was rampant among the poor before the revolution. )  They apparently enjoyed reading the Count of Monte Cristo; there is now an eponymous cigar named  in honor of the fictional aristocrat. I bet they have to read political tracts as well, though I'm not sure.  Attendance is required; I imagine a lot of workers would prefer to skip the daily reading session.  I told one worker that if I worked here I would organize poetry readings--every worker could bring a favorite poem for discussion.  "What country are you from?" she asked.  "I come from country even redder than yours," I replied.  "I am a poet. I come from Mars!"

The workers get paid according to the number of cigars they make.  One older worker--she said I could ask her anything except her age--makes 170 a day.  Most younger workers make a good deal fewer.  The quality of the cigars made here, all destined to be exported, is undoubtedly very high.

That night, the doctor in me came to the fore: how sad it is that two of the three main Cuban industries--there are not many--namely, sugar and cigars, are both injurious to health.  (The third industry is tourism.)  While trying to fall asleep, I wrote the following little poem in my head:

Fish and Tobacco

What improves health? Poisson
What is tobacco? Poison
Which one are you on?  If you're eighty
or ninety, no need to respond.

Notes
This is a little study on the syllable, "on" which occurs in every line in various ways, along with an assonant "one" in line three.  The French refers to a lesson everyone who has  studied French knows: what a difference one consonant can make!  Poisson=fish. Poison= poison.  "Which one are you on?" that is, "Are you addicted to healthy or unhealthy things?"  If you're very old, there is no need to answer, either because your genes have protected you or you have led a healthy life-style and don't need anyone to tell you, among other things, not to smoke.

After our visit to the cigar factory, we had  a salsa lesson at a local dance studio.  Nirmala and I don't usually do the salsa; when one is being played, we take a break.  These lessons were very good.  The two instructors, one male and one female, taught us six different moves, each lasting two measures.  From now on, we won't be caught sitting down when a salsa is played

After lunch, we visited Finca Vigia, ("Lookout Farm"), Ernest Hemingway's estate near Havana.  As one might expect, there were a lot of books on shelves and a lot of animal trophies on the walls.  He bought the impressive estate with his prize money for $12,500 in 1940.  It seems that Susan Hayward liked to swim naked in the pool.  Hemingway's wife got jealous one day and took all of Hayward's clothes into the house, forcing the actress to return there without a stitch.  Celos, tu nombre es mujer.




At dinner, we were entertained by a trio of fine musicians.  Nirmala and I got up and danced.  The singer later told us that in the ten years she has been performing here, we were the first ones to dance.  She was quite pleased.




We ended our stay in Havana with one of the many surprises Lyn had for us: a tour of the city via well-maintained classic cars from the 1950s, abandoned by wealthy Cubans who were displaced by the revolution. (Since 2014, Cubans can buy used and even new cars, but it's very expensive to do so. The traffic is still like the traffic on Charles Street, a local street near our house--at 4 a.m. Very few cars in Cuba--not a bad thing.



March 30, 2017, en route to Cayo Santa Maria

This was a long travel day. On the bus, I wrote the shortest poem of the journey, three lines, a poem entitled "Sound Advice":

Sound our nature, humans, be
otiose as grass--Poetry;
one could do worse and you do.

Notes:
"Sound" refers to making music, and to delving into the depth's of human nature.  When one makes this journey, life becomes more objective, thus "my" changes to "our." (By the way, this is the first and probably the last time I will ever use the word "otiose" in a poem; it is rarely used and means "of no practical purpose." But on the spiritual level grass isn't worthless at all--every blade is priceless.  If you don't believe me, read Walt Whitman). Poetry here has two meanings as well: the first being generosity and loving-kindness and the second having to do with actual poems. We all fall short of the goals of love and wisdom,  as the last line indicates.



We made our first stop at Cienfuegos, a quaint town.  There Lyn gave us another treat: an a capella group, Fusion, performed for us. They covered a lot of centuries and cultures, beginning with a medieval Spanish piece, "O Magnum Mysterium," and ending with "Honeypot," which evoked Roaring Twenties America.  They sang a few Cuban songs and a gospel standard as well.  They were very good indeed.

My favorite singer of the group, a bass, is hidden by the third alto on the left.  All sang well, however.

We visited the Bay of Pigs, the site of the invasion by about 1,500 Cuban exiles in 1961.  They expected that the locals would join them, but they didn't.  They also picked a strategically poor site to land; the invasion was over almost as quickly as it started.  Plans for the attack started under Eisenhower; Kennedy, however, decided not to intervene. (The Bay of Pigs beach is currently occupied by Canadian and European tourists.)


"When Imperialism wanted in vain to dig a trench, the Revolution erected an impenetrable bulwark."

If Imperialism had really wanted to dig trenches, they could have dug many indeed.  The defeat of the unsupported, ill-planned incursion became a major source of propaganda for Fidel.

March 30th is Nirmala's birthday.  I asked Lyn whether I could give a toast to Nirmala at dinner, but, Lyn, as usual, who had found out it was my wife's birthday from her passport, had everything covered:




The cake tasted a good deal better than it looks--a pleasant surprise!

We finally reached the Cayo Santa Maria resort.  It is a lovely resort, pools, spacious rooms and a beautiful private beach.  No Cubans here; everything is booked with pesos convertibles, the currency foreigners must use.  Cuba needs hard money, and this is one of the places they get it.  Drinks and meals were included; several tourists--not from our group, of course--had a good deal more than one mojito too many.  One zigzagging drunk became the source, perhaps, of "Me like rum," the first line of my last poem written in Cuba.



The service at the resort was not good.  Many Cubans who work in the service industry have a lot to learn.

March 31, 2017

This day included a visit to an old sugar mill, no longer in use. We also visited the town of Remedios which has an annual competition every December 24th, called Parrandas.  Not much to see when the competition isn't taking place; a video would have helped.


We had several opportunities to see and to listen to fine street musicians such as these.

The rest of the day we had free time at the resort.  I spent some time reading at the pool.  I especially enjoyed an article from a recent edition of The New York Review of Books, a copy of which I had brought along: the subject of the review is a book by Ben Lerner, "The Hatred of Poetry"; the article was written by Charles Simic, one of the finest contemporary American poets.  It seems that poetry, in contrast to prose, aims higher; it seeks to reach a transcendent realm and thus necessarily fails.  (Hasn't Mr. Lerner ever heard of dukka, the Buddhist term for the insufficiency of all experience?)  Simic informs us that a professor contends that nobody reads poetry today because much of it lacks political content.  Then, Wallace Stevens, is quoted, who believed that poetry should not be political at all.  All of this, combined with my impressions of Cuba, resulted in the following poem:

When they sound right, the best poems'
images lead us to Zion.
Suits pass by, rags beg from tents;
is prose the rose of sentience?

Verse? What good is a buried pearl?
Must our music always fail?
No.  If we wrought in-side and out,
what we write would sell.  Yeah, right.

Around this time, I wrote another poem, this time dealing with a very different subject: the contrast between Cuba and the United States:

Cuba, No--Yanqui Tampoco

We make, that is made, Castro
Convertibles.  They transform dollars into pesos
convertibles. The contrast between us
is incontrovertible: things and more things
in my country assail; in their country,
conscience is jailed--Can good neighbors thrive without
freedom that's fair?  God's here nor there;
injustice is justice unshared.

Does anyone remember the Castro Convertible commercial from the 1950s?  It depicted a little girl opening the couch into a bed.  It is so easy, dear consumer, even you can do it!

April 1, 2017

After we left the resort, our first stop was the town of Santa Clara. This is an important site of revolutionary history; it was the first city that fell under the impressive leadership of Che Guevara.  (He famously derailed a train carrying "fascist"--is that the right word?--soldiers, who surrendered without resistance.)




Che left Cuba to start revolutions elsewhere,  He was murdered, with CIA collusion, in Bolivia.  His grave remained there for twenty years; his remains were then  exhumed and sent to Cuba. The granite mausoleum in Santa Clara has an eternal flame before Che's tomb.  The vault contains the ashes of several famous--to them, at least--Party members. Faux religiosity reigned.  You weren't allowed to talk, take pictures, etc.  Two female guards were present to assure that regulations were not abrogated.  One of the members of our group said something, almost in a whisper; for this one of the guards yelled at our tour guide.  He obeyed them, told the offending tourist to keep quiet, and left.  Later, he expressed his frustration with the nasty guard, who was annoyed by a whisper, yet tolerated the sounds of salsa outside.  "That's Cuba!" he grumbled.

If this had occurred in the United States, I imagine the following dialogue might have taken place:

Guard: Please stop talking!  No talking allowed here.
Visitor: This is a free country and you have no right to speak to me in that tone.  Besides, I'm only talking in a whisper--which I will continue to do.  I know my rights.  Where's the sign, by the way, that requires us to be silent?
Guard: If you don't stop talking, you will have to leave this room immediately.
Visitor: It is time to move on to the next room anyway.  (Spoken sarcastically) Have  a  nice  day!

If our tour guide had said half as much as the imaginary visitor above, I think he would be in serious trouble. The cult of revolutionary figures is important for the regime, since without it, people might complain more about the hardships they have had to endure. I don't have a good idea of how the average Cuban views the current regime.  Our guide says the campesinos adore Fidel--he really did a lot for them--but not every Cuban is a campesino.

Immediately after our visit to the Che shrine, we attended a concert, just for us, of Trovar music; a very talented and apparently well-known musician, Juan Carlos Campos, sang traditional Cuban standards, such as the famous bolero, "Quizás, Quizás, Quizás," by Osvaldo Ferrés.  He accompanied himself splendidly on the guitar. 



I was even more impressed by his son, who accompanied his father on the violin.  His son was smaller and more introverted, in contrast to his extroverted father.  The former is a superb violinist and accompanist--He always knew that he was there to supplement his father's performance; he never showed off.  The inner-outer combination of the two was a delight to see and to hear.
Being rather "inner" myself, I rarely request to be photographed with performers after a concert.  This time I couldn't resist.





After the concert, we traveled to the charming town of Sancti Spiritus, where we stayed for the final two nights of the trip.
After dinner, some of us danced at a local club next to the hotel, along with many Cubans of all ages. The musicians played nothing but salsas--no complaints.  We had a lot of fun.

April 2, 2017, Sancti Spiritus

Much of the day was spent visiting the town of Trinidad, a Unesco World Heritage site.  The town is well-maintained and lovely.  We had time to shop a bit as well.





April 3, 2017 Sancti Spiritus

We had a delightful tour of a local music and dance elementary school.  About eight students, from the ages of about 10 to 12, dazzled us with solos on their chosen instrument--piano, guitar, flute, trumpet, violin, etc.  They were all good, but the flute soloist, Alejandro, was especially impressive; he played just about at a professional level.  We were told that he soon would audition for further studies.  If he doesn't pass the audition with flying colorful notes, justice, in my opinion, should demand another revolution. 

We also saw a dance performance.  The smallest dancer, a small, delicately built prepubertal boy, especially impressed.  When he twirled his partner around, a girl who towered over him, he had a full smile on his face, a professional smile.  He was already a pro; I hope he will have a significant growth spurt.

Our last stop was a visit to the workshop of Lazaro Nieblas. He makes portraits of local inhabitants out of wood.  There is a shortage of material in Cuba; he told me that he sometimes uses the wood from old doors.  I was very impressed by his work.  He makes very subtle portraits; when you look into the eyes of his subjects, you feel as if you're looking into their souls.  He is a very good artist indeed. 
  


After, that, we traveled back to Santa Clara for our flight to Fort Lauderdale.  Our subsequent flight from Miami to Baltimore was uneventful.



Lyn told as at the beginning that there is no other country like Cuba in the world, and she was right.  I was astounded to see a country without strip malls, billboards, Walmarts, ATMs, McDonalds, etc.  This is the only country I know where the poor have come out on top. But the top is no bigger than a molehill; the poor remain poor and the more educated are not much better off--and have become restless. Widespread use of the internet is coming, along with many other changes.  The economy is already changing with the advent of the tourist industry.  Workers in this field are paid in the tourist currency, pesos convertibles, which significantly increases one's purchasing power. I am not idealizing Cuba, I am aware of the governmental abuses, regimentation, lack of opportunities, etc.    Despite everything, however, I think all of us were impressed by the many positive aspects of Cuba, the most important of which is the Cuban people.  An unforgettable experience!

And, last not least, all the members of our group were friendly and kind; we "clicked" with several of them.  This added to the enjoyment of our educational visit to Cuba.  I end this travelogue by thanking, once again, our fantastic tour guide, Lyn, and our excellent local tour guide. José.  

Addendum, the Last Poem

This poem really doesn't fit in with the others; I'm including it in an addendum, for the sake of completeness.  The first line came to me, as I mentioned earlier, after witnessing a drunk adult at the resort, who was acting like a child.  My mind immediately rhymed "rum" with "gun"--the third and fourth lines were originally and logically, "Me Cuban-/Amerikun," but I ditched that, since it could be interpreted as an ethnic slur, which was certainly not intended.  It became a poem about the overuse of fuel, a significant factor behind  the looming global warming crisis, which continues, degree by degree, to affect us all.  Americans have five per cent of the world's population, yet consume 20% of the world's energy.  In this poem, the consumption of meat symbolizes this excess use of energy, since it takes four times the amount of it to produce meat rather than vegetables.


A CEO’s Inner Child

Me like rum
Me like gun
Me Me Me 
Amerikun
Fuel me waste
Because Me First
Chicken, pork,
Lobster, Steak,
Me want some
Me no
Veg
it
tar
iun
Not pan sit,
Beef tongues, pigs’ feet,
Me eat meat
Well done, well done,
Terre brûlée
Me eat someday
Sun-baked Earth,
Me just dessert,
Mother Nature screwed.

4.05.2017

Rezension: F, ein Roman von Daniel Kehlmann

F
Daniel Kehlmann
Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag
Hamburg, 2014
380 Seiten




Daniel Kehlmann wird immer besser mit der Zeit. "F" ist ein psychologisch raffinierter, sorgfältig aufgebauter Roman.  Das Thema des Romans ist Identität. Was heisst das,  eine Person zu sein? Was geschieht, wenn  das Ich bei Jungen nicht enfalten kann, weil kein Vater vorhanden ist?  Nichts Gutes.  “F” handelt sich um drei Jungen, einen  Halbruder und ein Zwillingspaar. Jeder ist auf seiner Weise psychologisch belastet, weil der Vater meistens abwesend war, und, selbst wenn er nach langen Jahren  wie aus der Luft erscheint, kommt er wie ein egozentrischer, liebloser, in Gedanken vorlorener Fremder vor, der schnell wieder verschwindet.

Ein ernstes Buch, aber mit leichter Hand geschrieben.  Keine Blindwurmsätze hier--Wie Kafka, schreibt Kehlmann klar und direkt; keine langen philosophischen Abzweigungen kommen vor.   Der Roman ist mit Szenen aufgebaut; “F” wäre eine gute Wahl fur einen Film.  Die Handlung ist so schlicht und plastisch, dass man sich nicht viel Mühe geben müsste, um daraus ein Drehbuch zu machen.

Der Halbruder Martin, der von Geburt an vaterlos aufwuchs, ist schüchtern und passiv.  Er ist in eine Lebenssackgasse geraten: er ist ein glaubensloser Priester.  Sein Trost ist Essen.  Eine komishce Stelle kommt vor, als ein Mann ihm eine Beichte ablegt, und plötzlich entdeckt, dass der Priester nicht zuhört, sondern isst.  Es handelt sich um einen Mann, der sich schuldig fühlt, weil er zuviel trinkt:

Sie essen!
“Kommen Sie in zwei Tagen wieder.”
“Hören Sie auf zu essen!"
"Ich esse nicht."
"Im Beichtstuhl!" 
"In zwei Tagen.  Wenn Sie nicht getrunken haben. Dann kommen Sie wieder!"
Das Holz knarrt, er geht.  Ich zerknülle die leere Metallfolie und denke an den zweiten Riegel.  Er ist noch in meiner Tasche, und dort wird er auch bleiben.
Ich ziehe ihn aus der Tasche.
                                                     
                                                             --S. 99-100

Humor, der hinter Unglück und Sinnlosigkeit steckt, ist ein Kennzeichen von Kehlmanns Prosa in diesem Roman. Zu manchen, die ihren Glauben verloren haben, kommt Trost, wenn sie ernst versuchen, den Nachbarn  wie sich selbst zu lieben.   Hier kommen Humor und Entwicklung der Handlung zusammen: Martin denkt nur an sich selbst. Sein Egoismus ist hier klar und komisch geschildert.

Der erste Bruder, Martin, scheitert an Narzissmus und Zwecklosigkeit.  Der zweite, Erik, wird ein sehr erfolgreicher Geschäftsmann.  Aber er ist leider  wahnsinnig: besessen, von Visionen verfolgt, huscht er gehetzt und angstvoll durch das Leben.  Unehrlich ist er auch: als Finanzberater,  betrügt er seine Kunden.  Glück hat er: gerade als seine List und Diebstähle zum Licht kommen, erettet ihn die Wirtschaftskrise von 2009, weil dann Geldverlieren normal geworden ist. 

Der andere Zwilling ist weniger seelisch belastet.  Obwohl er, verwundet wie seine Brüder, sich vor die Öffentlichkeit schützt, hat er Tatent.  Er nimmt den Namen eines eben gestorbenen Malers an, malt Gemälde in seinem Stil, und wird dadurch berühmt.  Seine Gemälde hält man für neuentdeckte Werke des Verstorbenen. Da hat Iwan zwei Vorteile: er kann arbeiten, ohne vor das Publikum kommen zu müssen.

Iwan ist der Einzige von den drei Brüdern, der gewissermassen glücklich ist, weil er das tut, was er liebt.  Martin wird Priester, um sich vor das Leben zu verbergen.  Erik wird ein verrückter sogenannt Erfolgreicher, weil er von Kindheit an Macht will, vermutlich weil er als ein machtloses, verlassenes Kind aufwuchs.

Kehlmann ist sicher kein Optimist; zum Happy End lässt er es nicht kommen. Weil Freude an seiner Arbeit ihn menschlicher und hilfsbereiter macht, greift Iwan automatisch bei einem Strassenstreit ein, um einem Geprügelten Beistand zu leisten, und wird sofort erstochen.  Sehr ironisch ist das--Es ist das erste Mal in seinem Leben, als er sich selbtbewusst genug fühlte, um seinen Mitmenschen zu helfen. Seine erste gute Tat bringt ihn aber um das Leben.  

Dagegen kümmern sich Erik und Martin um niemanden; wenn Gelegenheiten für Martin vorkommen, Gutes zu tun, hilft er anderen nur in seinen Gedanken.  Und er ist Geistlicher!

Wichtig für die Auslegung des Werkes ist ein Roman im Roman, “Mein Name sei Niemand," den der Vater verfasste, nachdem er beide Familien verlassen hatte.  Hier beschreibt Kehlmann den zweiten Teil jener Schrift:

Im zweiten Teil geht es um etwas anderes.  Darum nämlich, so versichert der Autor, dass du, jawohl du, und das ist keine rhetorische Wendung, dass also du nicht existierst.  Du meinst, du liest das hier?  Selbtverständlich meinst du das  Aber hier liest keiner…Es gibt keine Farben, sondern Wellenlangen, es gibt keine Töne, sondern schwingende Luft...
                                                                                                                                                                       S 87

Die Wahrheit will dich Brei machen, eine Suppe von Materie.  Es gibt keine Seele, nur ein Wizard of Oz, der im Gehirn an die Hebel geht, um sich täuschene Bilder und Gedanken vorbringen zu lassen, welche wähnen, dass solches eine Person ausmacht.

Ist das aber so traurig?  Viele Wissenschaftler sind damit einverstanden, ohne das Leben sinnlos zu betrachten.  Es ist auch ein Kernbegriff des Buddhismus: anatta, “nicht atman”, d.h. es gibt kein dauerhaftes Ich hinter Gedanken und Erfahrungen.  Die Einsicht macht Buddhisten eher heiter und selbst(los)zufrieden als verstimmt. Ich bin auch dieser Meinung, und leide nicht darunter.

Aber für Westlichen, (und auch für die meisen Östlichen), ist ein an Existenz bedrohtes Ich Grund zur Panik.

Kehlmann schreibt im Roman, dass nach dem Lesen von "Mein Name sei Niemand",  wie beim Lesen von "Die Leiden des Jungen Werther" im 18. Jahrhundert, Selbstmordfälle vorkommen.  Ein Film könnte vieleicht ein paar Zuschauer dazu verleiten, sich das Leben zu nehmen. aber ein Roman in dieser Zeit? Ich finde das höchst unwahrscheinlich. Es ist nicht so schlimm, Herr Kehlmann, dass das Ich  nicht im absoluten Sinn vorhanden ist: wir leben unter Relativitäten—Wir sind eine sogar.  Das Ich ist im tiefsten Sinn zwar eine Illusion, aber wir sind, sagen wir, 99% Illusion, sonst hätte unsere Gattung nicht überleben können.  Dass man wähnen kann, dass man apart von der Natur lebt, ist ein schöner und notwendiger Trick der Evolution.  Ohne diesen Trick hätte man keine Werkzeuge, keine Musik, keine Schriftsteller. 

Der ichlose Mensch, der immer die andere Wange hinhält, wird sehr schnell "sein" ichloses Grab finden.  ("Wer lebt durch das Schwert, stirbt durch das Schwert--Aber wer gibt das Schwert auf, stirbt am Kreuze."--Simone Weil).

Einige Elemente der Handlung sind übertrieben. z. B.: Der Junge, der Iwan das Leben nahm, beichtet vor Martin, und wird sogar, aus Schuldgefühl, und auch weil Martin keine bessere Weise weiss, um von ihm loszukommen, sein Assistent.  Unwahrscheinlich! Aber das ist eine Nebensache.

Kehlmanns Buch ist eine grosse Leistung. Im Grunde ist Kehlmann, wie Kafka,  ein Schwarzseher--ein Eyore mit Humor, eine erfrischende Verknüpfung.   Ich habe den sicheren Eindruck, dass die Ichlosingkeit des Lebens für Kehlman eine trauige Sache sei. Aber für mich, der mehr oder weniger (mehr weniger) Buddhist ist--ich weiss, dass ich zwar im Grunde ichlos bin, aber trotzdem "ichig" handeln kann und muss--leben wir doch auf dem Boden, auf der Oberfläche der Erde--unterhält dieser Roman von der ersten bis zur letzten Seite.



Anmerkungen

Mein besonderer Dank gilt Mary Upman vom Deutschen Literaturkreis in Baltimore.  Sie hat diese Rezension vorsichtig korrigiert and verbessert  Vielen Dank, Mary!

Weitere Artikel auf deutsch von Thomas Dorsett (Googeln Sie den Titel und dem Namen, Thomas Dorsett)

1. Jakob der Lügner, von Jurek Becker
2. Die Weisheit und das Alter

3. Ruhm von Daniel Kehlmann
4. Die letzte Welt von Christoph Ransmeyer
5. Die Herrlichkeit des Lebens von Michael Kumpfmüller
6. Nacht ist der Tag von Peter Stamm
7. Amon von Jennifer Teege und Nikola Sellmair

6. Aller Tage Abend von Jenny Erpenbeck

-

3.14.2017

Two Reasons for the Current American Malaise


The United Sates is in decline, and things are getting worse.  Some of this is inevitable, and has to do with the rise in wealth around the world.  A good deal, if not all, of our decline, however, is our own fault.  Our political system is, to put it mildly, broken.  Our social system, that is, the current state of education, and the truly abysmal state of health care, contribute to the increasing malaise.  It’s not only our institutions that are at fault—a large part of the population knows more about Beyoncés and Gagas than they do about science and literature. Many live in a virtual world of entertainment, instead of in the real world where facts, sometimes hard facts, matter.  Integrity, dedication, life-long learning, and, most of all, working hard at something you love to do, are still the essentials.  These qualities, on the whole, seem to be getting rarer. The fault is in ourselves; if ignorance votes at the polls and indifference doesn’t even bother to show up, greed and solipsism, forsaking the common good, will win.  And they are, arguably, winning. I don’t want to give the impression that things are hopeless, because they are not, far from it.

In this article, I will briefly discuss two interrelated areas where the American decline, in my opinion, is most apparent. First a few words of introduction.

World War ll, in a way, was Hitler’s gift to the United States.  By 1945, Germany lay in ruins.  The U.S. benefited from the brain-drain of Europe, which began when Hitler took office.  Brilliant refugees, Einstein, for example, enriched the United States   World War ll ended the Great Depression, and brought about the transfer of power from Europe to North America.  Third world countries remained undeveloped.  The heady days of American prosperity had begun.

The heady days of prosperity for the majority of Americans are over.  Why? I will discuss only two of the principal causes of the current malaise, in order to keep this little essay little; this list is by no means exclusive.

1.The Decline of the First Amendment

Recently, my wife and I attended a performance of “King Charles lll” at the Shakespeare Theater in Washington, D.C.  The play begins with the funeral of the current Prince of Wales’s mother. Her son has become King Charles lll.  In Britain’s parliamentary democracy, custom requires the signature of the monarch on every bill before it becomes law.  Custom also demands that the hand must sign as mechanically as a rubber stamp, without any input from the monarch’s brain.  In the play, a bill has been passed that abrogates free speech, strengthening the ability to sue for libel.  The King, acting in a very American way, refuses to sign it, causing a crisis about the prerogatives of royalty.  It ends badly for King Charles; his eldest son, with the blessing of Parliament, deposes him, returning monarchs back to the status they have had for a long time--Once again they become figureheads, that is, as far as the state is concerned, heads that no longer figure.

Nearly all Americans would root for King Charles.  Our royalty is our Constitution.  To all true-blooded Americans, of all races and creeds, the First Amendment reigns supreme.  Adopted on December 15, 1791, it guarantees the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, the right to petition for a governmental redress of grievances, and the right to choose one’s religion, including the right to choose no religion at all.
Nothing reveals the importance of these rights more than their absence. The classic example of fascism is Nazism, which, with all its pomp, can certainly be considered a secular religion, the established religion of Hitler's Germany.  The disaster of Nazism is a warning to us all as to what can result when a powerful nation has no purchase for the inalienable rights protected by the First Amendment.

The First Amendment is the most powerful guarantor of free speech in the world.  Interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean that not only bills abrogating free speech cannot become laws, it limits the ability to sue for slander as well.  (Our current president has a dictator’s fondness for the First Amendment, that is, none at all.  All of Trump’s attempts, however, to sue people who say things he doesn’t like have been thrown out of court. So far.)

The mindset of cultures where free speech is not guaranteed does not understand cultures which consider free speech to be sacrosanct.  In most Muslim countries, for instance, criticism, much less caricatures, of Mohammad aren’t permitted, and sometimes are even  punished by death.  When a Dane, exercising his free speech, lampooned the Prophet in cartoons, many Muslims abroad were convinced that he did so with governmental support.  They could not fathom that democracies have laws which restrict the power of government.  That the government of Denmark refused to ban an activity which they deem blasphemous was proof enough for them that the government was in agreement.

A key advantage of free speech is that if competing ideas are allowed to mix, as cream in a butter churn, the butter, the good ideas, will eventually rise to the top. 

One of the great aspects of free speech is that it fosters humility, a virtue always in short supply.  I might believe something passionately, but I acknowledge that I could be wrong.  The same thing applies to those with an opposing view.  Once opposing views pass through the alembics of many minds during unhindered debate, with time truth will prevail.

This of course is an ideal that has never been completely realized; however, in modern America, the First Amendment is under threat as never before.  Money talks while far too many keep silent.  Votes are bought.  Politicians sell themselves in order to get elected.  The heinous Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court allows rich special-interest groups to make unlimited political contributions.  Too many people are too busy with Beyoncé to realize that they are beyond say in the direction of our democracy.  Why should a politician, bought off by the rich, listen to ordinary citizens, the backbone of democracy? We are getting to a point where, manipulated by sophisticated propaganda relentlessly advertised by special interests, the unhindered exchange of ideas no longer occurs. 

The decline of the effectiveness of free speech, however, is not inevitable.  With better leaders, elected by a better-informed electorate, the practice of the First Amendment in America can be very much improved.


2.  Health Care

What a mess!  The United States, the richest country in the world, is eighth place in rank among countries in the world regarding such things as infant mortality rate and longevity.  Not bad, but we should be doing better.  Regarding health care, however, the U.S.A. ranks thirty-fifth, just above Romania.  We spend about twice as much on health care as do other industrialized countries.  Our bangs for the buck seem to be coming from handguns.  The disastrous state of health care in America threatens our respectable rankings in other areas.  If we continue to emphasize external defense while neglecting internal defense—and improving the health of all citizens is certainly an internal defense, American decline is all but guaranteed.

I am writing this the day after the Congressional Budget Office announced the likely effects of the current Trumpcare proposal.  Millions will lose coverage; the numbers of the uninsured will increase greatly.  Oh, yes, the rich will get a lot richer, since Tumpcare is limited care, Obamacare on the cheap.  The proposal is an absolutely disgraceful transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich.

Mr. Trump announced that the decrease in regulation, and the return to an almost unfettered free market, will assure that the insurance industry will be able to cover everyone.  This is ridiculous.  No country has ever been able to provide affordable health coverage for all without governmental involvement; it can’t be done.

It is mere propaganda to promise coverage at no higher cost to those with preexisting conditions, if the healthy are not required to participate, and if we all, especially those of us who are very rich, do not pay our fair share of the cost.

Republicans obviously don’t consider health care to be a right.  Their primary concern is to reduce taxes. 

Among those who would be most affected by Trumpcare are the Trump voters. When will they realize that they’ve been had?  

Elected Republicans are backing—at least for now—an incompetent president, since they believe he is a means to accomplish their ends.  All politicians want power, granted; but when Republicans sacrifice the common good for the good of a few, which they are currently doing in a truly shameless way, decent conservatism becomes an oxymoron.

Threats to the First Amendment and the lack of health care for all are not the only threats to our nation.  Other factors, such as a uniformed and a politically inactive electorate, rising inequality, fanaticism, ignorance, a broken educational system, xenophobia, racism, sexism, polarization, etc., if left unchecked, will also continue to significantly contribute to a decline of a nation that still remains among a beacon of light in a darkening world.

Each of us must earn the oil which keeps the torch of liberty burning brightly.  If we don’t, night will remove an incomparable vision.

3.13.2017

A Trinity of Absences: What We See, What We Feel, Who We Are


I wanted to pick up my cat--
Her fraught look said, "Please don't do that!"
Why did I leave her on the chair?
Gopinathan wasn't there.

1.

I just wrote this little poem.  It is not fiction--the only thing I changed was the location, for the rhyme--the phantom cat was staring at me from a bed, not a chair.  She looked quite different, as if she were woven into the surrounding tapestry.  I stood in the hallway by the entrance to a bedroom, the door of which was open.  Gopi loves to sleep on the bed in that room.  Sometimes when I pass by, she gives me a frightened look, hoping I won't go in and play with her.  (I like to pick her up sometimes and hold her over my head.  She doesn't always appreciate this, and this was one of those times.  Or was it?)

Gopi admittedly looked strange.  Her head seemed to have shrunk a bit and her eyes looked even more mysterious than usual.  It was definitely my cat, however; I assumed that the oddities were due to the fact that I wasn't seeing things clearly.  As I approached, to my utter surprise, Gopi disappeared like a pointillist portrait that becomes just a bunch of dots when seen up close.  My cat was an unmade bed; a rumpled bedspread convinced my mind that Gopi lay on it, staring up at me.  I walked over to tufts and folds, still completely convinced that it was her--until I was about three feet away.



                   Gopinath on the bed where I saw Gopinot.

This was a particularly vivid example of a frequent occurrence.  Yes, I often see what isn't there.  When I am lost in thought, say, trying to find the right word for a line of a poem, I am very unmindful of the outside world.  If I'm lucky and find the right word, the world reconstructs itself before my eyes.  Where are the keys?  I have no idea.  My wife tells me to think backwards in time and recall what I did with them, but this is impossible for me, since I was preoccupied when I put them down somewhere.  They must be on the desk, I tell myself.  And for a second or so, I see them clearly on my desk; then they disappear.  Then, for another second I might see them on the radiator.  Not there again!  I eventually find them, say, on my piano.

The previous day provided another example. At the Giant supermarket, which is gigantic, I got separated from my wife.  I saw her approaching me from the other side of the store.  As I approached her, however, her face began to dissolve into someone else's.  This happened twice.  At least I don't hear voices, I told myself.  "Tom!," she called from a distance.  I turned around immediately.  No one was there.

I am sure that we all have had similar experiences.  The brain likes to make sense of what it sees; it tends to see familiar patterns in something random, such as The Virgin Mary on a potato chip, a ghost in a photo, or a face staring at us from a rock formation on a Martian landscape.  We also sometimes see what we, sometimes desperately, want to see: an aural or visual hallucination of a newly deceased loved one, for instance.   In my case, the cat hallucination falls into the category of the brain trying to see familiar things; the keys hallucination falls into the category of seeing what one wants to see.

If we have a scientific view of the world, and if we are not mentally ill or in an acute stage of grief, these visions are brief and inconsequential.  

When Marley asked Scrooge if the latter doubted the former's ghostly presence, Scrooge told him he did: You are probably just an undigested piece of cheese, he told the spectral visitor.   Marley, in the 1951 classic film version of A Christmas Carol,  thereupon rattled his chains in such a frightful way that Scrooge became convinced of his deceased partner's reality.  The ghosts in Dicken's tale are vividly drawn, they possess the "flesh and blood" verisimilitude of his other characters.  In other words, here the supernatural appears natural.  This is, of course, fiction.  Visions sane people have tend to be fleeting and insubstantial.

There are also borderline cases.  Mental illness and mental health are to some degree social constructs; if we look at these two extremes as bookends and consider humans as books, we are all situated at different places between the two supports.  Most of us are lucky enough to have a position nearer to the mental-health bookend.  But it takes a lot of books to make a human shelf; others are in the unlucky position of being closer to the other side, madness.  The latter books are filled with hallucinations that have become the authors' reality.  Toward the mad end, hallucinations don't disappear like the brief smoke from a gutted candle; they remain a long time, like some underground fires that have been burning for years.

I had a friend, now deceased, a lovely, inscrutable book situated on the shelf of humanity more than halfway toward the bookend of mental illness.  She was a good poet, but had difficulty communicating--Perhaps she suffered from a high-achieving form of autism.  I was reading her first book of poems, when I came across the following lines:

Having arranged your own funeral,
you decided to attend it.

I liked that.  It reminded me a little of Dickinson, whose poems about the reality of death are both understated and shocking. Treating a corpse as if it were a living being in such a context brings home the reality of death.  You didn't attend your funeral, your corpse did.  I told my friend that I liked those lines and why I liked them.  She had no idea what I was talking about.  It seems that during that funeral, she had actually "seen" her deceased friend walking toward her. She carefully watched him walk through the main aisle of the church at the end of which, he, well, exited.  She had had a very close look at this apparition, who took a long time to vanish.  She was convinced, and remained convinced to her dying day, that she had seen him in the same way she had seen mourners-in-the-flesh at the service. My poet friend had a difficult time "fitting in"--if the book that was her life had been much closer to the wrong bookend, however, she wouldn't have fit in at all.

To sum up: minds often trick.  Sometimes what we think we see is a familiar image is an illusion overlying something else.  But is it only the mind that deceives us?


2.

I am typing this essay onto my computer, while sitting at my desk.  It is a fairly large computer desk, with several drawers and a section for my hard drive.  A  half-full coffee cup rests next to my desk lamp.  I put my hand on my desk.  It is hard, strong enough by far not to give way to the pressure from my hand; it does not adjust to my weight the way a soft mattress would if I should lie on it.  I stare at the desk’s surface.  Its color is pale green.
  
Now let’s look at my desk from a different perspective.  Wood is composed of 50% carbon, 42% oxygen, 8% hydrogen and 1% of a variety of trace elements.  Molecules of wood are held together by covalent bonds.  These bonds are quiet strong.

Now let’s examine the nucleus of an element.  The nucleus is so small, it is hardly there.  A speck of dust floating in Carnegie Hall, that’s about the size of the nucleus compared to the size of the entire atom. Electrons, which give atoms their properties, are even smaller.  The atom is therefore, over, way over, 99% empty space.  How can empty space be supporting my coffee cup?  Those numerous Atlases holding it up are those tough covalent bonds—What my elbow feels as it rests on the wood is the barrier made by the electromagnetic force of these bonds.  Matter takes up an infinitesimally small amount of the otherwise vast empty space of the wood.  In a way, there is just about nothing there.

Why is the color of my desk green?  Because the paint on the surface absorbs all wavelengths of light except a certain wavelength which, reflected into my eyes and then into my brain, is interpreted by consciousness as green.  Furthermore, if we put out the lights out on a dark night, (or close our eyes), there is no color anywhere.

This is an important point: black is the way our brain interprets a certain wavelength.  Colors do not exist without brains.  Nor are they fixed; some brains, such as those of a bee, see different colors than we do, because their brains interpret wavelengths of visible light differently.

Similarly, the form and texture of a desk arise in our minds from the sensory data it receives.  The substance of a desk is, therefore, a construct of the human brain.  A thought experiment: if I were a neutrino, I would pass right through the wood without colliding with anything and without feeling any electromagnetic force.  For a neutrino, the desk isn’t there.


It seems to me that inscrutable combinations of something “out there” with something in our brains constitute the world.  But for some scientists, as well as in classical Advaita Hinduism, the entire world is a construct of the mind.  The conclusion regarding the relativity of things, however, in both cases would be the same.

The difference between the reality of hallucinations discussed in section one and the “hallucinations” of our concrete world discussed here is that while the former are often brief, the latter last a lifetime, since they are constructed by the exigencies of our bodies, which last a lifetime as well.  As far as what’s “really” out there, nobody knows. Do we stop here?  We've discussed two types of sensory interpretations of a who-knows-what?  Is there a third?

3.
Yes, there is.  Sensory activity of the brain, and perhaps factors beyond it, is the method by which you construct you.
You didn’t choose your genes; you didn’t choose when or where you were born.  What do you choose then? Truth is, any choice you make is as non-existent in an absolute sense as is the color yellow or a fleeting vision of a cat that’s not there. 

What about free will, which most of us accept as an axiom. It is an illusion as well. You in a very real sense don’t make any decisions at all.  Functional MRIs have revealed that decisions are made by the brain before one consciously decides to do something.  Everything is outside of a person’s control for one good reason: a soul, a personal I, the conscious “decider”, whatever you wish to call it, does not exist either.



This is an illusion called Kaluzska's Triangle. Think of the lines and the circles as the apparatus of the brain.  It produces the white triangle that is seen by the brain, but really isn't there.  The white triangle is you.

Thoughts just happen.  Voluntary actions just happen as well.
This is science as well as classical Buddhism and Advaita Hinduism.  If you would like to read the science that supports it, you might want to begin with Sam Harris’s excellent book, “Waking Up.”  If you want to read about the non-existence of the self from an Advaita Hinduism aspect, read the teachings of Ramana Maharshi, or you may wish to read my blog, The Near-Death Experiences of Ramana Maharshi.  

The three characteristics of existence according to Buddhism are dukka, anicca and anatta—namely, the inability of life to completely satisfy you, the fact that everything changes, and the fact that there is no abiding self behind our thoughts.  This can be found in many texts; I suggest you read, What The Buddha Taught by Walpola Rahula, or one of my many blogs, e.g. Buddhism Through Pictures: The Four Noble Truths, Ramana Maharshi and the Rabbi, Ramana Maharshi and Cartier-Besson, Ramana Maharshi and the Five Skandhas, The Cosmic Dance, Everything and Almost Nothing: Consciousness and the Theory of Everything.
To many Westerners, and to many Easterners as well; to all those obsessively attached to their egos, this first might appear to be bad news.  But it is good news--and a relief--to the wise.

Does being nothing mean that we do nothing and just passively let things roll?  Far from it, far from it--even though a fatalist conclusion might appear justified at first.  Why should we try to make decisions when we really can’t make decisions? How can we grow in wisdom and love if everything is determined?  

That is the subject of my next essay, which will appear in about a month on this blog site.

4. 

That’s all for now--I think I see my cat staring, waiting to be fed.  We'll see.

3.01.2017

The Baltimore Online Book Club: " Pierre; or, The Ambiguities," by Herman Melville


Pierre; or, The Ambiguities
by Herman Melville
Penguin Books, 1966
362 pages

"Let the ambiguous procession of events reveal their own ambiguousness."  --page 181

The book we discussed in the March, 2017 meeting of the Baltimore Online Book Club is Herman Melville's seventh novel, published in 1852, "Pierre; or, The Ambiguities." I found the novel to be uneven, yet fascinating.



                              Herman Melville,  1819-1891

I chose the last two books we read, the first being "The Insulted and the Injured," by Dostoevsky.  I selected these because I read both of them about fifty years ago, and wondered if I would consider both to be as interesting to me now as they were then.  In the case of the Russian novel, it is indeed a good read, but far from Dostoevsky's best.  Regarding Melville's novel, few of the novels we've read affected me as deeply as Pierre.  I suppose I have a lot of explaining to do, since the novel was a failure then and is rarely read now.  The opportunity to do just that pleases me.

I will discuss four reasons why I think that the novel is significant: 1) It is perhaps the first modern novel, with a content that provides a biting criticism of all those who believe life's ambiguities can be neatly resolved; 2) the quality of the language and style; 3) This one is the most important--Melville's beautiful and profound commentaries on life scattered throughout the text, and finally, 4) Melville's dark religious stance, followed by a brief discussion of what I consider to be its pertinence today.

1. Its Modernity

If a book is to be judged by the number of copies sold, this novel was a financial and critical disaster. Contemporary reviewers wondered if Melville had gone mad.   Here is a quote from the review of the book in the New York Herald as reprinted on the back cover of the Penguin Classics edition:  "Ambiguities indeed!...the dream of a distempered stomach, disordered by a hasty supper on half-cooked pork chops." Although modern critics have been a lot kinder, it has never been a success with the general public, and probably never will be.

One of the reasons for its initial failure is its caustic criticism of the Gothic novel, an exceedingly popular genre at the time.  In such novels, the hero might have faced chapters of suffering and tribulations, which at the novel's end are invariably and happily resolved.  (Dickens's David Copperfield, undoubtedly a work of genius, is a prime example.) In Pierre, many of the cliches of the Gothic novel are satirized; no one lives happily ever after--in fact, not one of the main characters survives the last page.

In music there is what musicians call a 5-1 cadence, such as Beethoven used in the opening section of his third piano concerto--ba-Bom, ba-Bom, ba-Bom.  This chord progression is eschewed in jazz, which has, regarding this cadence, a "been there, done that" attitude.  The Gothic novel is like a 5-1 cadence in literature; great works of art in the past  have used all-must-end-well plots, but they appear very old fashioned now.  Melville was perhaps the first to indicate the approaching death of the Gothic novel, although no one realized it at the time

Another aspect of modernity in Pierre is its deliberately absurd, non-linear plot.  Pierre gives up his future as gentleman as well as husband to hide the fact that his father had a daughter out of wedlock.  Oh, come on.  His abandoned fiance, Lucy, ignored for many, many pages while Pierre lives with his supposed half-sister Isabel, is being courted by Glendinning Stanley, the callous cousin of the disinherited Pierre. Instead of accepting his advances, she decides to live in poverty with Pierre and Isabel, without making any demands.  Oh, come on.  Isabel believes that the guitar in her possession was her mother's, although there is absolutely no proof that this is the case.  Why is Isabel convinced?  When she whispers "Mother, Mother" to the guitar, it responds with a musical echo.  Oh, come on.  Toward the end of the book, Pierre, while living in poverty, suddenly becomes a well-known author, with absolutely no indication of an ability or even desire to write in the many preceding pages of the book,  Oh, come on.

There are so many "Oh, come ons" in the book that we can only conclude that Mellville did not take the plot seriously, in the usual way at that time; he in no way intended to write a "typical" novel. What he did write was perhaps the first modern novel ever.

Three hundred plus pages of satire would prove to be boring, and this book is anything but.  We will explore the glories of the novel in the next two sections.


2. Melville’s Use of Language

The scholar Henry A. Murray described the writing style of Pierre as being a “miscellany of grammatical eccentricities, convoluted sentences, neologisms, and verbal fetishisms.”  When I read that, I said to myself, “This man has a prose, if not prosaic, mind.  While I was reading the book, before I read Murray’s opinion, I said to myself, with joy, “This man (Mellville) was a poet!”

If you love poetry, you will see Melville’s writing style differently.  You will fall in love with the verbal invention, the rhythms, and the imagery. 

An example:

No Cornwall miner ever sunk so deep a shaft beneath the sea, as Love will sink beneath the floating of the eyes.  Love sees ten million fathoms down, till dazzled by the floor of pearls.  The eye is Love’s own magic glass, where all things that are not of earth, glide in supernatural light.  There are not so many fishes in the sea, as there are sweet images in lovers’ eyes.  In those miraculous translucencies swim the strange eye-fish with wings, that sometimes leap out, instinct with joy; moist fish-wings wet the lover’s cheek.  Love’s eyes are holy, lovers see the ultimate secret of the worlds; and with thrills eternally untranslatable, feel that Love is god of all.  Man or woman who has never loved, nor once looked deep down into their own lover’s eyes, they know not the sweetest and the loftiest religion of this earth.  Love is both Creator’s and Saviour’s gospel to mankind, a volume bound in rose-leaves, clasped with violets, and by the beaks of humming-birds printed with peach-juice on the leaves of lilies.     

                                                                             pages 33-34

Only a poet could write like this.  Notice the rhythm of the sentence that begins with “The eye of Love”.  Any lover of poetry will read this line metrically.  It begins with four iambs, followed by the spondee, “All things”; then--the unaccented “where” should be swallowed, that is, not counted--the line proceeds with an anapest and an iamb.  Then the rhythm is broken again just where you want it: on “glide”, which is followed by three dactyls ending with an emphasis—again, just where you’d want it, on “light.”  There are many such examples of an impressive rhythmic musicality, which is characteristic of poets, throughout the book. 

I don’t doubt that Melville’s description of love as sometimes leaping out of the organs of sight like “eye-fish with wings” would have been classified by Murray under the rubric of “convoluted sentences and verbal fetishisms,” but to those who love poetry, the image, not to mention the rhythms of the sentences, works.

Examples like this one abound in Pierre.  This one is by no means the best of them. (There are, admittedly, obscure and convoluted passages as well.)

Another important concept to mention here is found in the subtitle of the book, “The Ambiguities.” For Melville, perhaps the first major modern writer, there are no longer any certainties.  Melville doubts everything, including his own worth.  The above passage demonstrates another achievement of Melville’s: deep down there, he believes in the transcendence of love, but can only permit himself to state and negate his faith at the same time.  The passage is both serious and ironic; it mocks all overblown paeans to love while confirming them at the same time. A strange combination of irony and conviction—a poetic ambiguous hymn to Love. Simultaneous praise and disdain which succeed on both levels is characteristic of Melville's mature style. 

I must note here that the language of the dialogues is very stilted.  Nobody says such things as “Yes! Yes!—Dead! Dead! Dead!—without one visible wound—her sweet plumage hides it.—Thou hellish carrion, this is thy hellish work!  Thy juggler’s rifle brought down this heavenly bird!  Oh, my God, my God: Thou scalpest me with this sight!” (page 362.)  Here Melville is mocking the writing style of would-be Hamlets who are in real life merely Peter Quinces.  Ironic passages like this, without poetic beauty, however, get to be rather tiresome.

It’s important to note here that Melville was no dramatist, and was probably incapable of writing effective dialogue.  The exchanges between Isabel and Pierre, when not viewed with irony, resemble the work of a third-rate writer, rather than the work of a first-rate one. 

When I had that “aha!” moment of realization that Melville was a poet, I ordered a book of his poems. Some are very beautiful indeed.  No doubt about it, Melville was a very competent poet.  In Pierre, pace scholar Murray, it shows.

3. Melville’s Reflections on the Inner Life

The same scholar we quoted above wrote, regarding Pierre, that Melville “purported to write his spiritual autobiography in the form of a novel.”  Although Murray missed the mark regarding Melville’s style, here he scores a bull’s eye. Melville thought deeply and profoundly about life, and expressed its sometimes otiose ambiguities after a process of what  Germans might call Auseinandersetzungen mit der Wirklichkeit, confrontations with reality, in truly beautiful passages throughout the book.  These “asides,” these commentaries, provide by far the best parts of the novel.  All of them are deeply personal and universal at the same time.

Melville was dissatisfied.  At the time when Pierre was written, his reputation as an author was in steep decline.  Melville wrote profoundly—not always, but after Moby-Dick, more and more so; the public, however, wanted lighter entertainment.  He played Bach while the public demanded Telemann. 

As is the case with many unhappy people of genius, Melville sought something better.  He had a deep religious yearning—he states in the book a variation of Hopkins’s "There lives the dearest freshness deep down things.”  Yet he was unable and unwilling to flout reason to find an unambiguous source of transcendence.  This is the source of his parody of the Gothic novel.  Many people—then as now—believed/believe in Providence, the concept that behind all suffering, the answer abides.  We may not see or understand it, but God is behind everything, and, with a case of faith, we, happily inebriated, become convinced that everything will work out for the best.  Melville, however, like many moderns, concluded that existence reveals no certainties, only deeper and deeper ambiguities.  Pierre is sort of a boxing match of the soul, Ambiguities  (modernity) vs. Providence, (the Gothic novel)--Ambiguities wins, having soundly blackened the eyes of Providence—including its mystical third one.

Melville beautifully expresses the absolute silence behind nature, including human nature, in the following passage:

All profound things, and emotions of things are preceded and attended by Silence.  What a silence is that with which the pale bride precedes the responsive I will, to the priest’s solemn question, Wilt thou  have this man for thy husband?  In silence, too, the wedded hands are clasped.  Yea, in silence the child Christ was born into the world.  Silence  is the general consecration of the universe.  Silence is the invisible laying of the Divine Pontiff’s hands upon the world.  Silence is at once the most harmless and the most awful thing in all nature.  It speaks of the Reserved Forces of Fate.  Silence is the only Voice of our God.
                                                                         --page 204

Another example is this truly remarkable passage:

In those Hyperborean regions, to which enthusiastic Truth, and Earnestness, and Independence, will invariably lead a mind fitted by nature for profound and fearless thought, all objects are seen in a dubious, uncertain, and refracting light.  Viewed through that rarefied atmosphere the most immemorially admitted maxims of men begin to slide and fluctuate, and finally become wholly inverted, the very heavens themselves being not innocent of producing this confounding effect, since it is mostly in the heavens themselves that these wonderful mirages are exhibited.
But the example of many minds forever lost, like undiscoverable Arctic explorers, amid those treacherous regions, warns us entirely away from them and we learn that it is not for man to follow the trail of truth too far, since by so doing he entirely loses the directing compass of his mind, for arrived at the Pole, to whose barrenness only it points, there, the needle indifferently respects all points of the horizon alike.
                                                               --page 165

Have the indifference of nature and the dangers of meaninglessness ever been more beautifully expressed?  How modern Melville sounds!

I will close with another of my favorite passages:

Sucked within the maelstrom, man must go round.  Strike at one end the longest conceivable row of billiard balls in close contact, and the furthermost ball will start forth, while all the rest stand still, and yet the last ball was not struck at all.  So, through long previous generations, whether of births or thoughts, Fate strikes the present man.  Idly he disowns the blow’s effect, because he felt no blow, and indeed, received no blow.  But Pierre was not arguing Fixed Fate and Free Will no, Fixed Fate and Free Will were arguing him, and Fixed Fate got the better of the debate
                                                                                 
                                                                            --page 182

So much for the common view that humans have an abiding self, independent of nature!  The modern view, espoused by many scientists, that free will is an illusion, finds an early and beautiful expression here.

Quotes like these are what makes Pierre unforgettable.  The novel is replete with such passages.

Conclusion

In Melville we find ambiguities, and the absence of God; in many modern writers, such as Roth, however, the question of God doesn’t even come up.  I am reminded here of a statement by the astronomer Carl Sagan, namely, that he was comfortable with ambiguity and can live well without the security of final answers. Melville couldn’t.  Despite all the modern aspects of this novel, Melville's  futile search for a hand beyond the stars, as it were, strikes many of us as being somewhat atavistic.  Perhaps he was looking in the wrong direction, outside rather than inside. 


Searching for meaning and failure to find absolute answers, however, has been part of the human condition since time immemorial.  The uncompromising pressure of catechisms has tried their best, throughout history, to crush the sphere of intelligence.  Sometimes, under intense pressure of the will to believe, the sphere disappears; sometimes it has enough stuff of its own to respond to the unrelenting gravitational force of irrational faith by converting its original elements into something more substantial.  It then becomes a star, and infuses the darkness with light. The resultant luminescence might not be what we want; it might seem cold and inhuman at first, yet it is light nevertheless. This light, photons of which spotlight a central component of Melville’s genius, informs much of the novel, making Pierre, at least for some readers, an albeit uneven, yet unambiguous delight.